Report 2008-2013

July 2013 Committee Report to the ISPP Executive and Council

 

Subject Matter Committee:

Biotic Constraints to Food and Fiber Production  

Established: August 26, 2013

Web address for SMC: to establish

Name (s) of personnel preparing report. Serge Savary, Chair

Nominated Officers. To be identified

Current membership

Name

Country (or international organisation)

e-mail

Physical address

Lilian Amorim

Brazil

lilian.amorim@usp.br

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, Departamento de Fitopatologia - ave. Padua Dias 11

Agronomia - 13418-900 - Piracicaba, SP - Brasil - Caixa-postal: 09

Didier Andrivon

France

Didier.Andrivon@rennes.inra.fr

 

Jonathan  Atungwu

IITA

jojerat1@yahoo.com

Centre for Community-Based Farming Scheme,

Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta,PMB 2240, Abeokuta, Nigeria

Kira Bowen

USA

bowenkl@auburn.edu

 

Fen Beed

IITA

f.beed@cgiar.org

IITA, Tanzania

Nancy Castilla

IRRI

N.Castilla@irri.org

IRRI

Emerson Del Ponte

Brazil

edelponte@gmail.co

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Porto Alegre, Brazil

Etienne Duveiller

CIMMYT

E.Duveiller@cgiar.org

CG Block, National Agricultural Science Center (NASC)  Complex

DPS Marg, New Delhi - 110012, India

Annika Djurle

Sweden

Annika.Djurle@slu.se

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept. of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Box 7026, SE-750 07 UPPSALA, Sweden

Matt Dickinson

United Kingdom

Matthew.Dickinson@nottingham.ac.uk

School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK, LE12 5RD

Paul D Esker

Costa Rica

PAUL.ESKER@ucr.ac.cr

Escuela de Agronomía, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro Montes de Oca, San José Costa Rica

Richard Falloon

New Zealand

Richard.Falloon@plantandfood.co.nz

 

Andrea Ficke

Norway

Andrea.Ficke@bioforsk.no

Bioforsk Plantehelse

Høgskoleveien 7, 1432, Ås, Norway

Greg Forbes

CIP

g.forbes@cgiar.org

CIP, 12 Zhongguancun South St., Beijing, China, 100081

Clayton Hollier

USA

CHollier@agcenter.lsu.edu

Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, 302 Life Sciences, Baton Rouge, LA  70803, USA

Wafaa El Khoury

IFAD

w.elkhoury@ifad.org

Senior Technical Advisor- Crops and Farming Systems

Policy & Technical Advisory Division,

Programme Management Department, Via Paolo di Dono 44, 00142 Rome, Italy. Tel. +39 06 5459 2817

J. Kumar

India

jkumar56@gmail.com

 

Zanhong Ma

China

mazh@cau.edu.cn

Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193

A. Murillo Williams

Costa Rica

adriana.murillowilliams@gmail.com

 

Neil McRoberts

USA

nmcroberts@ucdavis.edu

 

Lise Nisltrup Jørgensen

Denmark

LiseN.Jorgensen@agrsci.dk

 

Lee Pearson

UK

L.Pearson10@imperial.ac.uk

Centre for Environmental Policy, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London

South Kensington, London, SW7 2NA

Serge Savary

France

Serge.Savary@toulouse.inra.fr

INRA-AGIR, 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville, CS52627,

F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France

Peter Scott

Cabi

p.scott@cabi.org

CABI, UK

Adam Sparks

IRRI

A.Sparks@irri.org

IRRI

Richard Strange

University London

R.Strange@sbc.bbk.ac.uk

63, Foxley Lane Purley, Surrey CR8 3EH, UK

Paul S Teng

Singapore

paul.teng@nie.edu.sg

 

Luo Yong

USA

ygluo@ucanr.edu

University of California, Kearney Agricultural Center,

9240 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648

USA

Dr. Yilin Zhou

China

yilinzhou6@yahoo.com.cn

State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests,  Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193,

P. R. China

 Committee Meetings:

The first meeting of the Subject Matter Committee is scheduled on August 26, 2013.

A tentative agenda has been submitted, as follows:

  • Origin of the Committee

-       Linkage with the ISPP Food Security Taskforce

-       Linkages with other ISPP Committees

  • Importance of the Committee

-       Importance of pre-harvest losses

-       Is there a need for a review of the current information on pre-harvest losses?

  • Overall positioning of the Committee

-       Review, comments, and/or approval of the Concept Note presenting the Subject Matter Committee (to be posted on ISPP website)

-       Should post-harvest losses be addressed by the Committee?

-       Should overall waste of positive agricultural outputs (especially food) be considered by the Committee?

  • Main directions the Committee should take
  • Action plan

-       Discuss a few (2 – 3) actionable ideas

-       Identify champions for these ideas

  • Other Matters (including next meeting of the Subject Matter Committee)

Committee Activities:

The activities of the newly formed SMC will be determined during this meeting (and in close linkage with discussions within the Global Food Security Taskforce).

Subject Matter Committee focus issues:

A first task of the SMC will be to develop a concept note to identify its importance and specify its scope. The following draft has been circulated and will be discussed.


DRAFT

Thursday 27 June 2013

ISPP Subject Matter Committee

"Biotic Constraints to Food and Fiber Production"

This new ISPP Subject Matter Committee on Biotic Constraints to Food and Fibre Production complements existing ISPP Committees, and will especially strive to provide the strongest possible support to the existing Task Force on Global Food Security. This new Committee will address crop losses in its broadest possible meaning.

The consequences of crop losses have many dimensions, direct and indirect, quantitative and qualitative. Crop losses caused by poor crop health represent threats for global food security and safety, which must be documented in order to be suitably addressed.

The multidimensional quantification of crop losses, in itself, is a critical field of investigation. One of the aims the new Committee could be to establish a global database on crop losses. This could be achieved in several phases, focusing, for example, on a few key crops, on a few world eco-regions, and/or on quantitative aspects first. The goal of the data base is not to simply be built, however, but to be used. The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment may provide some inspiration, and multidisciplinary systems analysis will provide inspiration for its use.

Quantifying crop losses should be seen as a starting point of the Subject Matter Committee on Biotic Constraints to Food and Fibre Production. Beyond the massive, immediate, impact of direct crop losses, the consequences of indirect crop losses are considerable, translating in:

-      increased vulnerability of agricultural systems and societal fabrics from a social and economic point of view, at different scales, from the producer to the global market, and

-      reduced ecosystem services, since each unit of untaken harvest corresponds to a commensurate waste of energy, water, know-how, biodiversity, culture, top-soil, inputs, and more generally, non-renewable resources.

Another task of the Committee on Biotic Constraints to Food and Fibre Production could be to develop a list of the above hidden components of losses. Next steps would involve their quantification, and their ranking depending on crops production situations.

This would pave the way towards general frameworks for multi-criteria crop health management strategies, and decision components for sustainable crop health management.

The understanding of processes associated with poor crop health and leading to crop losses also contributes to one of the main goals of the ISPP and its Task Force on Global Food Security: identifying scenarios for future crop health and their crop loss consequences in a changing world, as well as the means to limit crop losses.

More generally, the Committee on Biotic Constraints to Food and Fibre Production should aim at more than just crop loss assessment, but position crop health in a broader matrix, which involves the economic, psychological, environmental and social sciences. This would enable the new committee to complement existing ones. Important links include strategic-long term assessments enabling policies and research priorities, as well as decision making for IPM.

Additional work identified: this will be done during the SMC meeting and through e-mail exchanges.

Submitted by Serge Savary, SMC Chair, Serge.Savary@toulouse.inra.fr